For a town dependent on Stars, there are far too few people here who look up at the sky. But come this Sunday, March 9th everyone will have a chance to marvel at our sky’s brilliance and fly through the depths of the Universe… all via your living room’s flat screen. The epic series of science, space and humanity has returned:
COSMOS: A Spacetime Odyssey
Thanks to FOX’s ambitious marketing, there is a strong chance you are aware of this. You might even have had the mental callback to the 1980 series of the same name, conceived of and hosted by the peerless Carl Sagan. His wise, comforting voice, as he strolled along the sea cliffs, taking us on a ‘personal voyage’ through the COSMOS, leveled a fierce impact on society; never before had such an ambitious undertaking been seen on television. The accompanying book was added to the library of Congress as one of the 88 books that helped to shape America.
But that was 1980. Unless you are 50+, you probably never watched the original series. And in these past 30+ years, science has barreled ahead, expanding our knowledge of the very small to the super galactic. This knowledge has thrown society into a technologically advanced always connected future. We all have our heads buried in a device with conversations and entertainment streaming, tweets chirping. But as Carl Sagan so eloquently stated:
We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology.
The new COSMOS, co-written by Sagan’ partner, widow (and ever inspiring) Ann Druyan, executive produced by Seth MacFarlane and hosted by astro physicist and science communicator Neil deGrasse Tyson aims to change that. It looks to once again bring the majesty of space and time to the masses by way of an engaging narratives and mind blowing visual effects… with the hopes of stimulating interest in STEM fields. This is a macro view of why COSMOS matters.
But why does it matter for Hollywood, specifically?
I’ll tell you why it will. And then why it should.
Why it Will:
Disrupting the Distribution Model (and Pilot Season is Dead):
FOX is changing the paradigm of TV distribution – it’s not just changing it, it’s blowing it up. It is releasing COSMOS on 10 channels SIMULTANEOUSLY, FOX national network and all FOX and Nat Geo affiliates — A first in cross network simulcast. Then one week later it will launch on 120 FOX International channels and 90 Nat Geo affiliates. This will equal 400 million potential viewing households OUTSIDE the US.
This bold move tracks with Kevin Reilly’s ‘war on pilot season’ where he announced at the TCA’s that FOX would be moving away from the traditional and costly practice of ordering pilots. Instead, Reilly asserts that FOX will focus on developing shows to be produced direct to series. If they invest in and shoot 13 episodes of an big budget new show, you better believe that bets will be hedged by an aggressive and international pre-sale and distribution plan. This comes on the coat tails of the new ‘Summer Event Series’ which began in 2013 with CBS’ UNDER THE DOME. It was a hi- concept, big budget 13 episode series that was unspooled uninterrupted.
COSMOS is a glowing nuclear example of this. Big budget, big concept, straight to series, week after week, across an international platform. This is not just event TV this is GLOBAL TV.
Trends and the Zeitgeist:
Space is starting to resonate amongst the masses again, if only revealed by the current success of space and scifi themed entertainment. GRAVITY won 7 Academy Awards and has made 750 million dollars thus far. HER won the Academy Award for best original screenplay. Scifi films are garnering Best Picture noms and scifi driven comic book franchises drive the summer box office. Christopher Nolan’s (and the now red hot Matthew McConaughey) next film is INTERSTEALLAR - a space and scifi drama. The singularity themed film, TRANSCENDENCE, about a scientist (Johnny Depp) uploading his brain to a computer releases in April.
And STAR WARS… STAR friggin’ WARS returns next December.
Thanks to the proliferation of Social Media, YouTube and the growth of ‘geek’ culture, scientists and science enthusiasts have found a digital community to plant their flag and unite. This network is growing exponentially (added: with offshoots of popular podcasts like StarTalk Radio and webseries like Minute Physics) and has a powerful and fervent voice online, allowing scientists, especially with a skill for science communication (like Neil deGrasse Tyson, Bill Nye, Sean Carroll, Michio Kaku and Brian Greene) to flourish and become celebrities themselves.
<Note: How could I neglect to include female scientists and science communicators who have amassed huge followings? Women like Lisa Randall, Jennifer Oullette and Cara Santa Maria to name a few>
And who has fast become the greatest science celebrity of all? Only the man that is turning his dreams into reality and taking us into a Space filled, electric car driven, solar powered future: Elon Musk. He populates the covers of magazines and even a few red carpets as well as Tony Stark himself. Science is getting sexy again.
Celebrities such as will.i.am and Geena Davis are stepping into the ring to promote Science Literacy and STEM (Science Technology Engineering and Math) Initiatives with their foundations. Celebrity entrepreneurs like Richard Branson’s (Virgin Galactic) and Peter Diamendes (X Prize) are looking towards the heavens (well lower orbit to be exact) for space travel and tourism. Seth MacFarlane’s lucrative relationship with FOX and his passion for science was the conduit to having Cosmos made at FOX (with little interference).
Watching COSMOS will only help Hollywood ‘powers that be’ keep up with the social and economic trends that are already occurring within a powerful group of consumers and influencers.
Why it SHOULD matter to Hollywood.
This answer isn’t as glamorous… but it all the more important:
There is a dire need for the general population to become Scientifically Literate and I believe that Entertainment is the best way to do that.
I stated as much in a tweet, that lead to a blog post reaction to the Creation Debate between Bill Nye and the head of the Creation Museum. This post lead to the formation of my ‘Actresses for STEM’ group of 5 SciEnthusiastic actresses now called SCIrens. (Official site and mandate coming soon). But one of our main goals is to spread our passion for science and STEM topics with the hopes of ultimately moving the needle to where science education seeps into the narratives of mainstream entertainment.
This is what COSMOS is aiming to do in the way that they have chosen to tell the tale of Humanity and the Universe — it is all based in storytelling (with mindblowing VFX and animation).
But it’s just the first step, the show is only 13 episodes. HOLLYWOOD needs to take up the charge.
Why Hollywood? As Dr. Tyson stated: he’s not so worried about children, they are inquisitive by nature and will gravitate towards science because they want to understand (if they are untethered). But it’s the scientifically illiterate adults ‘who are in charge’ that worry him. Our government is no bastion for science literacy. The important decisions to be made regarding our climate and the economics around it can and will threaten our future, if only because those in charge don’t have the tools to look at the bigger picture and the general population don’t have the knowledge to call them out on it. Climate change is real, our planet teeters on the brink of irreparable harm. We need the power of educated minds to collaborate and innovate a solution, and an educated population to support it. But because of a lack of science interest and education, 40 percent of Americans still disbelieve in evolution. In 2007 a research postulated that 217 millions Americans were unable to make sense of a basic science or technology article in the New York Times. As Carl Sagan again so eloquently stated:
Ignorance reigns in our society at a moment when science is on the cusp of doing amazing and wonderful things, but also dangerous things. We can’t afford to be ignorant.
BUT… Entertainment has the power to be an undercover teacher for adults. We can start infusing bits of science education into the narrative of our entertainment. Have STEM characters be more prevalent, where talking about their day brings science into the mix. Bring in more science and technology storylines. Align with Geena Davis’ Gender in Media Initiative. Create a smaller web or sister cable stations that focus on these sort of programming. Have initiatives to educate kids to code, learn Math and Science through innovative engaging ways, perhaps through interactive webseries and video games – immersive, world building ones that could teach coding and DNA, then engineering…
And it’s not like it hasn’t been done before. STAR TREK inspired a generation of scientists and it continues to inspire. What was created out of the minds of scifi writer and put in front of a camera has now become science fact and tangible technology.
There is a reason (but not the only one) that Gravity didn’t win best picture. We are holding on to our past, dissecting it, apologizing for it, peeling back layers to analyze it. We don’t have the connected faculties to experience a new modern scientific life. It’s as if our arms are extended, fingertips curled around the last remnants of the 20th Century. But we are here. In the 21st Century. The world needs to be viewed through a new lens… new stories and challenges illuminated. The future should excite people, like it did in the 60’s. Instead most media paints it with a bleak palette. How can we change that?
YOU, Hollywood. You can help change it. You’ve been instrumental in supporting equal rights through bringing gay characters and same sex love/ marriage into television, so do it with science! Art and Science ultimately aim to answer the same question. Who are we? Why are we here?
Don’t be afraid to deviate from the path – look at TRUE DETECTIVE —the existential dark themes that weave their way through this harrowing narrative are CAPTIVATING people. It’s not science but it speaks through certain cosmic truths when you look at our small relativistic place in the universe. It can be devastating and awe inspiring, something that makes us think and want to investigate further.
So investigate COSMOS, dear Hollywood. Sit down with your family, your friends, and give yourself over to the majesty of the Universe and our tiny brilliant place within it. See what ideas germinate subconsciously from the knowledge that will seep in naturally through the magical storytelling. And then call a staff meeting and start thinking ahead, to better Entertainment, thus to a better future.
On a final note, FOX’s decision to release COSMOS on a global platform makes me think of the KARDASHEV SCALE. It’s the framework scientists use to categorize a civilization’s energy usage – but it also has been used to describe the stages of society. A Stage 4 society spans a galaxy. We are stuck at Stage 0 – still in conflict amongst our own planet’s population. Stage 1 will be accomplished when we are a planetary civilization, united as one. Perhaps COSMOS is emblematic of the step we need to make to get there. And see? You just learned something. Wasn’t it fun?
Please check out SCIrens, the SciEnthusiast Actress group that I have started with Rileah Vanderbilt, Clare Grant, Tamara Krinsky and Christina Ochoa. We will be LIVE TWEETING the COSMOS premiere on Sunday. More info on the event and our group coming soon on the Twitters. We would love for you to join in.
You can reach me at ContactTaryn@gmail.com or on twitter.
All fields of science, when pushed to the very edge, touch on larger human issues. —
Alan Lightman, the first professor to receive dual appointments in science and the humanities at MIT, expands on his views on science and spirituality at a February 18, 2014 talk at The New York Public Library.
Lightman’s latest book, The Accidental Universe, is a mind-bending, soul-expanding must-read
Alright fine, I must write. The fury that has hit twitter and the interwebz in the wake of yesterday’s #Creationdebate has not left me alone. I must be accountable for the statement I made on twitter (which has now been shared by many of my peers - thank you!) The tweet:
You all probably know what happened, but in a nutshell, Bill Nye aka The Science Guy, traveled to the Creation Museum in Kentucky and debated Ken Ham, the founder of said Museum and the site Answers in Genesis. Mr. Ham is a creationist; believes the book of Genesis accurately describes the creation of Earth. He believes that our planet is 6000 years old and doesn’t believe in evolution. When I had first heard of the debate I got a little excited, thinking what a great opportunity Dr. Nye had to educate someone (and their fans) about scientific truths and shed light on… how do I put this delicately and not offend anyone’s beliefs… ummm … no way around it: Crazy talk. But as a friend of mine pointed out — just debating the man was a bad idea as it brought unneeded attention and press to him. Which I ended up agreeing with when I tuned into the debate yesterday. I listened to Ken Hamm for 20 seconds and then had a physical reaction and had to turn off the stream. His words physically sickened me. Not because he is a malicious person spreading hate, but rather false knowledge, that he so vehemently believes in an impossible narrative and wants to educated children with these backwards ideas.
But that is all I am going to say about Mr Hams beliefs. The Bible is a sacred book to millions of people that has been an important and pervasive element in the framework of multiple civilizations for centuries. I will leave my views on religion and Mr. Ham’s fundamentalist views for another day far far in the future.
But what Mr. Ham made me realize (so thank you Mr. Ham), is how passionate I am towards the scientific community and how much I want to help share the brilliant work that its members are dedicating their lives towards. I want to bring that knowledge into the mainstream, make STEM issues and careers something that the general population is excited about. I know that I tweet a lot of science article links and even blog and post about them but I need to do more. I want to do more to share the importance and wonders of science literacy… maybe even lend a hand in growing it.
Why? Two reasons:
First, I believe that our society needs to become scientifically literate if we are going to survive as a species (oh is that all). This point exists in two sub-topics for me. One, is that technology we can’t even fathom today will be an integrated element of our near future. Think of the tech we have today vs. 10 years ago. Now advance that exponentially. Nano tech, bio-implants, smart cars, smart houses, smart grids, quantum computing, AI — The science fiction we consume for fun is making it’s way through the blood brain barrier of a writer’s noggin and into reality. It should be concerning that a majority of the population which will be dependent on such integrated technology will have little to no knowledge of how it actually works (see Carl Sagan’s quote). Two, we have put our planet on a potentially irreversible path to destruction, where we will be unable to sustain our soon to be 10 billion people population due to carbon emissions and the climate change which it spurs. Only minds versed in biology, geology, genetics, oceanography, physics and the like can spur innovation that will reduce emissions, find solutions to energy issues and reverse damage that has already been done. Innovation won’t miraculously occur — It needs science trained brains.
Second, I believe that being exposed to science is awe inspiring. It inspires you to be curious. It puts your life into a unique perspective — it enables you to see your life in a relative sense, so small and insignificant in the scope of time and the universe (so why not go for your dreams!) and it enables you to see how miraculous your life is — the brilliant miracles of molecules and consciousness, the fact that you are inhabiting a beautiful planet in the far corner of one of a 100 billion galaxies (so go for your dreams!). The miracle of existence, the beauty of nature is FRIGGIN AMAZING!
So those are my reasons.
But who am I to get involved in this topic? I have no PhD in Physics, I didn’t even study science in college! (Though I did some math as an Econ major). But it’s for these very reasons that I am so passionate about this endeavor! I am self taught. So you can be too. In starting to write science fiction, I began my science research and became enthralled. Then the research and study became a reason in and of itself. And I started subscribing to news feeds, and became joyfully assaulted by the daily news briefings on the discoveries that scientists around the globe were making — how could I not be hearing of them in the mainstream?!
So here we come full circle to my original tweet and hashtag — #ActressesforSTEM. Why female actors? Because we would appear to be the antithesis of science ambassadors. When you hear the word Actress, you think Hollywood, glitz and glamour, divas, drama — you don’t think Science, Tech, Math and Engineering. The roles that female actors are often relegated to are ‘wife’, ‘mother’, ‘babe’, ‘waitress’ — not a chemical engineering badass. And I happen to know a lot of amazing (badass) actresses who are huge science enthusiasts: Rileah Vanderbilt, Tamara Krinsky, Clare Grant, Michele Boyd, Christina Ochoa Lopez to name a few — and some of those ladies have science degrees to boot. And there are actresses out there who I am not acquainted with (yet) like Danica McKellar who are active in their STEM work. The word ‘actress’ grabs attention and makes people take notice, maybe even take interest in what we are saying, if only out of curiosity — but that’s a great place to start.
So what if we all band together and make STEM outreach and exposure part of our career mandate:
— where we seek to create and or portray female characters who are scientifically literate, characters that ideally have careers in STEM fields.
— where we strive to be a part of / or create projects that have educational science elements to them.
— where we band together and support STEM causes and projects.
This endeavor can only help the work that many groups are doing to increase female presence in media and entertainment. If you haven’t seen this site yet, please visit Geena Davis’ Institute on Gender in Media and read her recent piece in the Hollywood Reporter. The BlackBoard posted a great article on media portrayals of women in STEM just today.
So as I start down this more public journey and hopefully band together with my fellow #ActressesforSTEM, what are the things I can suggest that you check out to get educated and inspired about STEM? I’m glad you asked!
- Danika McKellar’s new Math Webseries on the Nerdist.
- Minute Physics
- ViHart’s Videos (math + music = magnificent)
- Star Talk Radio from Neil deGrasse Tyson
- Phil Plait’s Bad Astronomy blog on SLATE
- Google the names of scientist Lisa Randall and host Cara Santa Maria (just go on my twitter feed and see who I follow, 50% are science related)
- Jason Silva’s 'Shots of Awe' videos for some scitech existential awesomeness.
- Set your DVR for the grand momma of them all: COSMOS!
I will be adding more, this is just to start. I especially want to put together a list of all the wonderful STEM ladies on twitter.
On a closing thought, I wanted to relay an excerpt from a book that I am reading. It chronicles Science and Physics articles over the past century in the New York Times. There is a section I stumbled across:
“It was curious to notice the intelligent interest taken by the humbler ranks of the Paris population in the great discovery of Marie Curie, when a few weeks ago, a small atom of radium was exhibited upon the boulevards. Even the artisans on their way to their work stopped to inspect and discuss it.”
This was dated March 6, 1904 in an article about a lecture which Marie Curie gave on Radium where 3000 people attended, standing for hours to get in. Many were turned away.
Humanity is curious by nature. Let’s stoke the fire.
I can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org and on twitter at @tarynoneill. Thanks for reading.
'It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better.
The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again,
because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause;
who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly …’
from his ‘Citizen in a Republic’ speech
Exclusive: Google to Buy Artificial Intelligence Startup DeepMind for $400M | Re/code -
We are now in the water, knee deep in the future.
“If you view crossing the finish line as the measure of your life, you’re setting yourself up for a personal disaster. … You need to honor the highs and the peaks in the moments — you need to prepare your life for them — but recognize the fact that the preparation for those moments is your life and, in fact, that’s the richness of your life. … The challenge that we set for each other, and the way that we shape ourselves to rise to that challenge, is life.”
— Sage advice on success and the meaning of life from astronaut Chris Hadfield – a fine addition to our ongoing archive of wisdom on life.